Brussels: Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has stressed that “political will” cannot be compromised in the context of the EU budget.
But a day after an incomplete video conference of EU leaders, it is not yet clear how soon the bloc will be able to find a resolution to end the so-called rule of legislation against Budapest and Warsaw.
Senior EU leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, are scrambling to resolve the budget crisis in a timely manner for a crucial summit on December 10-11, thus blocking corona virus epidemics. Historical mark of 1.8tn Avoid delay in reply.
At the heart of the dispute between the immovable governments of Brussels and Poland and Hungary is a mechanism by which the government has conditioned EU taxpayers’ money on respect for basic principles, including the independence of the judiciary.
Diplomats representing Mr Orban and his Polish counterpart, Matthews Morawiki, said on Monday that they would veto the EU’s seven-year budget package because of their objections to the law.
Mr Orban said on Friday there was still room for compromise, adding that the budget debate could “reach its climax” and that there were “many possible solutions”. It is just a question of political will.
But in the absence of an agreement, the EU will be forced to adopt an emergency austerity budget from January 1 next year, resulting in billions of euros in payments to member states, including Hungary and Poland, suffering the worst economic stagnation. Crisis after World War II
Daniel Freund of the Green MEP urged the European Union and the German government, which is holding the rotating presidency of the bloc, to stick to their guns on the rule of law.
“It will send a strong signal to Hungary and Poland that their fight is futile, and that they cannot stop betting, and ultimately they cannot win.”
The parties are now preparing for detailed talks. Officials have described the coming weeks as a high-risk game of chicken, with both sides trying to blur each other out. EU officials say the agreement between Hungary and Poland will be among the biggest losers of the budget without an agreement, as they will face a disproportionately unprofitable loss of EU funds that will cost them. Make up at least 5% of GDP.
For their part, Warsaw and Budapest have calculated that Brussels will have to offer concessions on the rule of law or risk greater losses, which are sorely needed in southern economies such as Spain, Italy and Portugal. Is.
Officials from the European Parliament and the European Union are convinced they will not rewrite the proposed legislation to address the concerns of Budapest and Warsaw.
Vera Jorrova, vice-president of the European Commission for Values, said on Friday that the procedure was “minimal” and that the EU had a right to know that taxpayers’ money would go where there was no threat to the rule of law. Is.
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union have a sufficient majority to pass the terms of the law under the right to vote, ie it can be applied.
Even if Budapest and Warsaw continue for whatever budget comes into force in 2021.
At the same time, some diplomats are talking about more extreme options, such as formally exploring Hungary and Poland from the recovery fund, as well as establishing an intergovernmental agreement between the other 25 member states.
This is a very last resort, but it has highlighted the deep frustration that Hungary and Poland have created among their EU partners.
EU diplomats hope that, for all Belize’s words, Poland’s resistance will be moderated in light of the urgent need for uninterrupted flow of EU money.
In private meetings, Polish officials attacked in a more peaceful tone than their Hungarian counterparts, an official said.
On Friday, Krzysztof Cesarzki, chief aide to Polish President Andrzej Duda, said he hoped the “compromise process” would be successful and that there would be another round of talks on the budget and the recovery fund.
But he also reiterated Poland’s criticism that the rule of law is ambiguous, claiming that the rule of law in the EU is political rather than legal.
“If we are to be punished for anything, we need to know for what and on what basis,” he told broadcaster TVP Info.
“This is not the case, because interests and politicians in Brussels have corrupted EU law for many years.”
Financial Times Limited 2020